↓ Skip to main content

Screening and pathways to maternal mental health care in a South African antenatal setting

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Screening and pathways to maternal mental health care in a South African antenatal setting
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00737-013-0343-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Vythilingum, S. Field, Z. Kafaar, E. Baron, D. J. Stein, L. Sanders, S. Honikman

Abstract

In low-resource settings, a stepped care approach is necessary to screen and provide care for pregnant women with mental health problems. This study sought to identify screening items that were most robust at differentiating women experiencing psychological distress and requiring counselling [assessed by screening with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and a Risk Factor Assessment (RFA)] from those with a psychiatric disorder as diagnosed by a psychiatrist. Case records of women in an antenatal mental health service in Cape Town were reviewed. Composite scores and individual items on screening scales (EPDS, RFA) of participants who qualified for counselling (n = 308) were compared to those of participants who were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder (n = 58). All participants with a psychiatric disorder were diagnosed with either depression or anxiety disorders. These participants had higher mean scores on the EPDS and RFA than those who qualified for counselling (p < 0.01). Logistic regression and ROC analyses suggested that the best items to distinguish women with depression or anxiety from those qualifying for counselling were 'I have felt sad and miserable', 'I am not pleased about being pregnant' and 'I have had serious depression, panic attacks or problems with anxiety before' (sensitivity 0.655, specificity 0.750 for this combination of three items). A small number of items may be useful in screening for mental illness in pregnancy which requires higher levels of care. Such screening may contribute to a more efficient stepped care approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Psychology 30 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#799
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,547
of 197,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.