↓ Skip to main content

Revealing the faults in medical journals

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Revealing the faults in medical journals
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00005-009-0012-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Liesegang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Librarian 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#323
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,717
of 94,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.