| Title |
A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Fernandez-Patron, Eugenio Hardy |
| Abstract |
The current science publishing system is in need of a positive transformation for the good of scientists and society as a whole. Herein, we propose features that, in our view, will distinguish the science publishing system of the future. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Peru | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,235,153
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#474
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,077
of 312,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.