| Title |
Gambling Technologies: Prospects for Problem Gambling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, September 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1023053630588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Griffiths |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,298,748
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#123
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,369
of 35,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them