↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Frequency of Seborrheic Keratosis Diagnoses as a Favorable Consequence of Teledermatology-Based Skin Cancer Screening: A Cross-sectional Study of 34,553 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Increasing Frequency of Seborrheic Keratosis Diagnoses as a Favorable Consequence of Teledermatology-Based Skin Cancer Screening: A Cross-sectional Study of 34,553 Patients
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40257-017-0283-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Moreno-Ramírez, Jesús Raya-Maldonado, Macarena Morales-Conde, Teresa Ojeda-Vila, Francisco J. Martín-Gutiérrez, Andrés Ruíz-de-Casas, Almudena Fernández-Orland, Herrerías-Esteban JM, Lara Ferrándiz

Abstract

Screening of skin cancer by teledermatology (TD) has improved the early detection of skin cancer by enhancing access to skin cancer clinics. We sought to analyze how TD-based skin cancer screening has changed the frequency of consultations for benign lesions. A cross-sectional study including teleconsultations received during a 7-year period was conducted to analyze and compare the trendlines of each lesion type over the study period. Trendlines were analyzed using a linear regression model with the R-squared (R (2)) test for goodness of fit. A total of 34,553 teleconsultations were included in the study. Seborrheic keratoses, followed by benign melanocytic lesions, were the most frequent lesions diagnosed. The pick-up rate for malignant lesions was 1:8.6 teleconsultations. Seborrheic keratoses and precancerous lesions showed a positive trendline with good fit to the linear model (R (2) = 0.8 and R (2) = 0.8, respectively). Tis-T1 malignant melanoma (in situ melanoma or melanoma with a Breslow thickness <1 mm) showed an increasing trendline with moderate-to-low fit to the model (R (2) = 0.4). TD-based screening of skin cancer is associated with an increasing rate of consultations involving seborrheic keratoses, which can be considered a consequence of improved access to dermatologists resulting from TD implementation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#900
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,230
of 310,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#31
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.