| Title |
Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-011-0066-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
European Society of Radiology (ESR) |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 24% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,797,978
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#147
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,001
of 190,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.