↓ Skip to main content

Disrespect for Human Rights and Contentious Participation: Evidence from China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chinese Political Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Disrespect for Human Rights and Contentious Participation: Evidence from China
Published in
Journal of Chinese Political Science, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11366-017-9475-x
Authors

Ching-Hsing Wang, Dennis Lu-Chung Weng, Laura Barnstead, Garrett DuMond

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 47%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#252
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,842
of 309,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.