↓ Skip to main content

In sweet harmony or in bitter discord? How cultural values and stakeholder requirements shape and users read an urban computing technology

Overview of attention for article published in AI & SOCIETY, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
In sweet harmony or in bitter discord? How cultural values and stakeholder requirements shape and users read an urban computing technology
Published in
AI & SOCIETY, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00146-017-0724-5
Authors

Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Netta Iivari, Arto Lanamäki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 25%
Computer Science 4 25%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from AI & SOCIETY
#642
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,389
of 314,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AI & SOCIETY
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.