Title |
Migrating from a legacy fixed-format measure to CAT administration: calibrating the PHQ-9 to the PROMIS depression measures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quality of Life Research, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11136-011-9882-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura E. Gibbons, Betsy J. Feldman, Heidi M. Crane, Michael Mugavero, James H. Willig, Donald Patrick, Joseph Schumacher, Michael Saag, Mari M. Kitahata, Paul K. Crane |
Abstract |
We provide detailed instructions for analyzing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected with an existing (legacy) instrument so that scores can be calibrated to the PRO Measurement Information System (PROMIS) metric. This calibration facilitates migration to computerized adaptive test (CAT) PROMIS data collection, while facilitating research using historical legacy data alongside new PROMIS data. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 26% |
Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 36% |
Psychology | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |