| Title |
Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-012-2745-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. K. Bickel, D. P. Jarmolowicz, E. T. Mueller, C. T. Franck, C. Carrin, K. M. Gatchalian |
| Abstract |
Recent studies on reinforcer valuation in social situations have informed research on mental illness. Social temporal discounting may be a way to examine effects of social context on the devaluation of delayed reinforcers. In prior research with non-drug-using groups, we demonstrated that individuals discount delayed rewards less rapidly (i.e., value the future more) for a group of which they are a member than they do for themselves alone. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,768,891
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,160
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,612
of 165,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#25
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.