↓ Skip to main content

Influences of speech familiarity on immediate perception and final comprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Influences of speech familiarity on immediate perception and final comprehension
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1297-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn K. Perry, Emily N. Mech, Maryellen C. MacDonald, Mark S. Seidenberg

Abstract

Unfamiliar speech-spoken in a familiar language but with an accent different from the listener's-is known to increase comprehension difficulty. However, there is evidence of listeners' rapid adaptation to unfamiliar accents (although perhaps not to the level of familiar accents). This paradox might emerge from prior focus on isolated word perception and/or use of single comprehension measures. We investigated processing of fluent connected speech spoken either in a familiar or unfamiliar accent, using participants' ability to "shadow" the speech as an immediate measure as well as a comprehension test at passage end. Shadowing latencies and errors and comprehension errors increased for Unfamiliar relative to Familiar Speech conditions, especially for relatively informal rather than more academic content. Additionally, there was evidence of less adaptation to Unfamiliar than Familiar Speech. These results suggest that unfamiliar speech imposes costs, especially in the immediate timescale of perceiving speech.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 14 30%
Psychology 10 21%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%