↓ Skip to main content

What’s new in neuromyelitis optica? A short review for the clinical neurologist

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
What’s new in neuromyelitis optica? A short review for the clinical neurologist
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00415-017-8445-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Whittam, Martin Wilson, Shahd Hamid, Geoff Keir, Maneesh Bhojak, Anu Jacob

Abstract

The evolution of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from a rare, incurable and misunderstood disease with almost universally poor outcomes to its present state in just over a decade is unprecedented in neurology and possibly in medicine. Our knowledge of NMOSD biology has led to the recognition of wider phenotypes, new disease mechanisms, and thus clinical trials of new and effective treatments. This article aims to update readers on the recent developments in NMOSD with particular emphasis on clinical advances, the 2015 diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, imaging, and therapeutic interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Neuroscience 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,016,483
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,678
of 4,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,761
of 308,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.