↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Polarization and Relaxation of 75As Nuclei in Silicon at High Magnetic Field and Low Temperature

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Magnetic Resonance, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic Polarization and Relaxation of 75As Nuclei in Silicon at High Magnetic Field and Low Temperature
Published in
Applied Magnetic Resonance, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00723-017-0875-z
Authors

J. Järvinen, J. Ahokas, S. Sheludiakov, O. Vainio, D. Zvezdov, L. Lehtonen, L. Vlasenko, S. Vasiliev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,457,417
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Applied Magnetic Resonance
#132
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,475
of 309,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Magnetic Resonance
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.