You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Urology, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ardeshir R. Rastinehad, Baris Turkbey, Simpa S. Salami, Oksana Yaskiv, Arvin K. George, Mathew Fakhoury, Karin Beecher, Manish A. Vira, Louis R. Kavoussi, David N. Siegel, Robert Villani, Eran Ben-Levi |
Abstract |
Given the limitations of prostate specific antigen and standard biopsies for detecting prostate cancer, we evaluated the cancer detection rate and external validity of a magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy system used at the National Institutes of Health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 5 | 25% |
United States | 4 | 20% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 16% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
Other | 46 | 26% |
Unknown | 21 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 52% |
Engineering | 15 | 9% |
Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#724,386
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#114
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,305
of 322,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.