↓ Skip to main content

Die „Hydrothermale Carbonisierung“: eine bemerkenswerte Möglichkeit, um die Entstehung von CO2 zu minimieren oder gar zu vermeiden?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Die „Hydrothermale Carbonisierung“: eine bemerkenswerte Möglichkeit, um die Entstehung von CO2 zu minimieren oder gar zu vermeiden?
Published in
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00003-009-0472-7
Authors

Peter Brandt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 21%
Chemistry 4 21%
Energy 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#51
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,069
of 95,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.