↓ Skip to main content

Machine learning of the spatio-temporal characteristics of echocardiographic deformation curves for infarct classification

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Machine learning of the spatio-temporal characteristics of echocardiographic deformation curves for infarct classification
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10554-017-1108-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahdi Tabassian, Martino Alessandrini, Lieven Herbots, Oana Mirea, Efstathios D. Pagourelias, Ruta Jasaityte, Jan Engvall, Luca De Marchi, Guido Masetti, Jan D’hooge

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the whole temporal profiles of the segmental deformation curves of the left ventricle (LV) and describe their interrelations to obtain more detailed information concerning global LV function in order to be able to identify abnormal changes in LV mechanics. The temporal characteristics of the segmental LV deformation curves were compactly described using an efficient decomposition into major patterns of variation through a statistical method, called Principal Component Analysis (PCA). In order to describe the spatial relations between the segmental traces, the PCA-derived temporal features of all LV segments were concatenated. The obtained set of features was then used to build an automatic classification system. The proposed methodology was applied to a group of 60 MRI-delayed enhancement confirmed infarct patients and 60 controls in order to detect myocardial infarction. An average classification accuracy of 87% with corresponding sensitivity and specificity rates of 89% and 85%, respectively was obtained by the proposed methodology applied on the strain rate curves. This classification performance was better than that obtained with the same methodology applied on the strain curves, reading of two expert cardiologists as well as comparative classification systems using only the spatial distribution of the end-systolic strain and peak-systolic strain rate values. This study shows the potential of machine learning in the field of cardiac deformation imaging where an efficient representation of the spatio-temporal characteristics of the segmental deformation curves allowed automatic classification of infarcted from control hearts with high accuracy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Computer Science 8 13%
Engineering 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,292
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,349
of 323,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.