↓ Skip to main content

Water-Wisteria as an ideal plant to study heterophylly in higher aquatic plants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,195)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Water-Wisteria as an ideal plant to study heterophylly in higher aquatic plants
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00299-017-2148-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaojie Li, Shiqi Hu, Jingjing Yang, Elizabeth A. Schultz, Kurtis Clarke, Hongwei Hou

Abstract

The semi-aquatic plant Water-Wisteria is suggested as a new model to study heterophylly due to its many advantages and typical leaf phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors and phytohormones. Water-Wisteria, Hygrophila difformis (Acanthaceae), is a fast growing semi-aquatic plant that exhibits a variety of leaf shapes, from simple leaves to highly branched compound leaves, depending on the environment. The phenomenon by which leaves change their morphology in response to environmental conditions is called heterophylly. In order to investigate the characteristics of heterophylly, we assessed the morphology and anatomy of Hygrophila difformis in different conditions. Subsequently, we verified that phytohormones and environmental factors can induce heterophylly and found that Hygrophila difformis is easily propagated vegetatively through either leaf cuttings or callus induction, and the callus can be easily transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. These results suggested that Hygrophila difformis is a good model plant to study heterophylly in higher aquatic plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,806,515
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#40
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,835
of 310,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.