↓ Skip to main content

Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 2,384)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13414-013-0578-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Franchak, Karen E. Adolph

Abstract

Possibilities for action depend on the fit between the body and the environment. Perceiving what actions are possible is challenging, because the body and the environment are always changing. How do people adapt to changes in body size and compression? In Experiment 1, we tested pregnant women monthly over the course of pregnancy to determine whether they adapted to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. As women gained belly girth and weight, previously passable doorways were no longer passable, but women's decisions to attempt passage tracked their changing abilities. Moreover, their accuracy was equivalent to that of nonpregnant adults. In Experiment 2, nonpregnant adults wore a "pregnancy pack" that instantly increased the size of their bellies, and they judged whether doorways were passable. Accuracy in the "pregnant" participants was only marginally worse than that of actual pregnant women, suggesting that participants adapted to the prosthesis during the test session. In Experiment 3, participants wore the pregnancy pack and gauged passability before and after attempting passage. The judgments were grossly inaccurate prior to receiving feedback. These findings indicate that experience facilitates perceptual-motor recalibration for certain types of actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#931,434
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#40
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,646
of 323,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.