↓ Skip to main content

Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States
Published in
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Colonoscopy has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality, and has been widely used for primary CRC screening in Germany and the United States. We performed a population-based analysis to evaluate and compare the public health impact of recent colonoscopy use on CRC deaths among adults aged 55 to 79 years in Germany and the United States from 2008 to 2011. The epidemiologic metrics of attributable fraction and prevented fraction as well as the impact numbers were calculated using colonoscopy utilization data from nationally representative health surveys, relative risk estimates from medical literature, and CRC death registry data. Overall, 36.6% (95% credible interval [CrI], 27.3%-45.5%) of CRC deaths in Germany were estimated to be attributable to nonuse of colonoscopy, compared with the U.S. estimates of 38.2% (95% CrI, 28.6%-47.1%) and 33.6% (95% CrI, 24.8%-42.2%) for years 2008 to 2009 and 2010 to 2011, respectively. The proportion of CRC deaths theoretically prevented by colonoscopy use within 10 years was 30.7% (95% CrI, 24.8%-35.7%) in Germany, whereas in the United States this proportion ranged from 29.0% (95% CrI, 23.4%-33.6%) for 2008 to 2009 to 33.9% (95% CrI, 27.4%-39.2%) for 2010 to 2011. Recent colonoscopy use is likely to have prevented a considerable fraction of CRC mortality in both countries, and more deaths could be avoided by increasing colonoscopy utilization in the target population. Attributable and prevented fraction can provide valuable information on the public health impact of colonoscopy use and guide the policy making.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,416,577
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#873
of 5,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,528
of 324,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#19
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.