You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Practical Limited Sampling Strategy to Predict Free Prednisolone Exposure and Glycemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ftd.0b013e31829daae4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Yates, Katherine A. Barraclough, Brett C. McWhinney, Jacobus P. J. Ungerer, Robert O. Fullinfaw, Peter G. Colman, Spiros Fourlanos, Solomon J. Cohney |
| Abstract |
Despite significant interindividual variability in prednisolone pharmacokinetics and potentially serious consequences with inadequate or excessive exposure, monitoring of prednisolone levels is not employed to guide therapy. As ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods can now measure the active free fraction of prednisolone, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of 15 published limited sampling strategies (LSSs) for predicting free prednisolone exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients and to examine the relationship between free/total prednisolone exposure and plasma glucose. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 56% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
#1,388
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,611
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.