↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Variable Selection: An Alternative Prioritization Strategy during the Nontarget Analysis of LC-HR-MS Data

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Chemistry, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Variable Selection: An Alternative Prioritization Strategy during the Nontarget Analysis of LC-HR-MS Data
Published in
Analytical Chemistry, May 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saer Samanipour, Malcolm J. Reid, Kevin V. Thomas

Abstract

Liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR-MS) has been one of the main analytical tools for the analysis of small polar organic pollutants in the environment. LC-HR-MS typically produces a large amount of data for a single chromatogram. The analyst is therefore required to perform prioritization prior to non-target structural elucidation. In the present study we have combined the F-ratio statistical variable selection and the apex detection algorithms in order to perform prioritization in data sets produced via LC-HR-MS. The approach was validated through the use of semi-synthetic data, which was a combination of real environmental data and the artificially added signal of 31 alkanes in that sample. We evaluated the performance of this method as a function of four false detection probabilities namely: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1%. We generated 100 different semi-synthetic data sets for each F-ratio and evaluated that data set using this method. This design of experiment created a population of 30,000 true positives and 32,000 true negatives for each F-ratio, which was considered sufficiently large enough in order to fully validate this method for analysis of LC-HR-MS data. The effect of both the F-ratio and signal to noise ratio (S/N) on the performance of the suggested approach were evaluated through normalized statistical tests. We also compared this method to the pixel-by-pixel as well as peak list approaches. More than 92% of features present in the final feature list via F-ratio method were also present in conventional peak list generated by MZmine. However, this method was the only approach successful in classification of samples, thus prioritization, when compared to the other evaluated approaches. The application potential and limitations of the suggested method discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 23%
Environmental Science 12 21%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,200,950
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Chemistry
#7,088
of 26,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,244
of 310,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Chemistry
#66
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,576 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.