↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of a telehealth parenting intervention: A mixed-disability trial

Overview of attention for article published in Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial of a telehealth parenting intervention: A mixed-disability trial
Published in
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Hinton, Jeanie Sheffield, Matthew R. Sanders, Kate Sofronoff

Abstract

The quality of parenting a child receives has a major impact on development, wellbeing and future life opportunities. This study examined the efficacy of Triple P Online - Disability (TPOL-D) a telehealth intervention for parents of children with a disability. Ninety-eight parents and carers of children aged 2-12 years diagnosed with a range of developmental, intellectual and physical disabilities were randomly assigned to either the intervention (51) or treatment-as-usual (47) control group. At post-intervention parents receiving the TPOL-D intervention demonstrated significant improvements in parenting practices and parenting self-efficacy, however a significant change in parent-reported child behavioral and emotional problems was not detected. At 3-month follow up intervention gains were maintained and/or enhanced. A significant decrease in parent-reported child behavioral and emotional problems was also detected at this time. The results indicate that TPOL-D is a promising telehealth intervention for a mixed-disability group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 69 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 10%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 83 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,393,794
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#1,171
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,047
of 324,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.