↓ Skip to main content

Volcanic natural dams: identification, stability, and secondary effects

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Volcanic natural dams: identification, stability, and secondary effects
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9101-2
Authors

Lucia Capra

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Philippines 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 50%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,526,794
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,478
of 76,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.