↓ Skip to main content

Anticipating the use of life extension technologies

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Reports, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticipating the use of life extension technologies
Published in
EMBO Reports, April 2010
DOI 10.1038/embor.2010.48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayne C Lucke, Danielle Herbert, Brad Partridge, Wayne D Hall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 22%
Philosophy 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,213,623
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Reports
#3,530
of 3,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,024
of 79,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Reports
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.