| Title |
The survival time of chocolates on hospital wards: covert observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.f7198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Parag R Gajendragadkar, Daniel J Moualed, Phillip L R Nicolson, Felicia D Adjei, Holly E Cakebread, Rudolf M Duehmke, Claire A Martin |
| Abstract |
To quantify the consumption of chocolates in a hospital ward environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,217 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1024 | 32% |
| United States | 306 | 10% |
| Australia | 125 | 4% |
| Canada | 81 | 3% |
| Ireland | 65 | 2% |
| Japan | 55 | 2% |
| Germany | 54 | 2% |
| Spain | 34 | 1% |
| France | 27 | <1% |
| Other | 243 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1203 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2064 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 646 | 20% |
| Scientists | 387 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 115 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 30% |
| Unknown | 39 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2974. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,262
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#59
of 65,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 323,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.