↓ Skip to main content

The Educational Consequences of Teen Childbearing

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Educational Consequences of Teen Childbearing
Published in
Demography, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13524-013-0238-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer B. Kane, S. Philip Morgan, Kathleen Mullan Harris, David K. Guilkey

Abstract

A huge literature shows that teen mothers face a variety of detriments across the life course, including truncated educational attainment. To what extent is this association causal? The estimated effects of teen motherhood on schooling vary widely, ranging from no discernible difference to 2.6 fewer years among teen mothers. The magnitude of educational consequences is therefore uncertain, despite voluminous policy and prevention efforts that rest on the assumption of a negative and presumably causal effect. This study adjudicates between two potential sources of inconsistency in the literature—methodological differences or cohort differences—by using a single, high-quality data source: namely, The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. We replicate analyses across four different statistical strategies: ordinary least squares regression; propensity score matching; and parametric and semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation. Results demonstrate educational consequences of teen childbearing, with estimated effects between 0.7 and 1.9 fewer years of schooling among teen mothers. We select our preferred estimate (0.7), derived from semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation, on the basis of weighing the strengths and limitations of each approach. Based on the range of estimated effects observed in our study, we speculate that variable statistical methods are the likely source of inconsistency in the past. We conclude by discussing implications for future research and policy, and recommend that future studies employ a similar multimethod approach to evaluate findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 47 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 7%
Psychology 9 6%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 44 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,245,381
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#597
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,733
of 216,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.