↓ Skip to main content

P. aeruginosa colonization at ICU admission as a risk factor for developing P. aeruginosa ICU pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
P. aeruginosa colonization at ICU admission as a risk factor for developing P. aeruginosa ICU pneumonia
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13756-017-0197-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fleur P. Paling, Martin Wolkewitz, Pieter Depuydt, Liesbet de Bus, Frangiscos Sifakis, Marc J. M. Bonten, Jan A. J. W. Kluytmans

Abstract

To determine the incidence of P. aeruginosa (PA) ICU pneumonia and its independent association with PA colonization at ICU admission. This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospectively collected cohort study. Adult ICU patients with a length of stay of ≥48 h were included and assessed for microbiologically confirmed PA ICU pneumonia. Multivariate survival analysis was performed, including the covariates age, gender, PA colonization at ICU admission, ICU admission specialty and mechanical ventilation at ICU admission, while taking into account the effect of competing risks. We included 5093 patients, 2447 (48%) were tested for colonization; of those 226 (9.2%) were PA colonized at ICU admission. The incidence of PA ICU pneumonia was 1.34% (n = 68). PA colonization was an independent risk factor (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-15.7), as was mechanical ventilation (SHR 5.3, 95% CI 2.7-10.6). In this study the incidence of P. aeruginosa ICU pneumonia was 1.34%. Hazard ratios for PA colonized patients compared to non-colonized to develop PA ICU pneumonia were 8.8. The high risk associated with P. aeruginosa colonization for subsequent infection may offer a target for future interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#1,200
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,161
of 313,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.