↓ Skip to main content

Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Disorders, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
91 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1047 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria
Published in
Movement Disorders, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/mds.26987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Günter U. Höglinger, Gesine Respondek, Maria Stamelou, Carolin Kurz, Keith A. Josephs, Anthony E. Lang, Brit Mollenhauer, Ulrich Müller, Christer Nilsson, Jennifer L. Whitwell, Thomas Arzberger, Elisabet Englund, Ellen Gelpi, Armin Giese, David J. Irwin, Wassilios G. Meissner, Alexander Pantelyat, Alex Rajput, John C. van Swieten, Claire Troakes, Angelo Antonini, Kailash P. Bhatia, Yvette Bordelon, Yaroslau Compta, Jean‐Christophe Corvol, Carlo Colosimo, Dennis W. Dickson, Richard Dodel, Leslie Ferguson, Murray Grossman, Jan Kassubek, Florian Krismer, Johannes Levin, Stefan Lorenzl, Huw R. Morris, Peter Nestor, Wolfgang H. Oertel, Werner Poewe, Gil Rabinovici, James B. Rowe, Gerard D. Schellenberg, Klaus Seppi, Thilo van Eimeren, Gregor K. Wenning, Adam L. Boxer, Lawrence I. Golbe, Irene Litvan, for the Movement Disorder Society–endorsed PSP Study Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,047 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 1045 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 157 15%
Other 117 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 11%
Student > Bachelor 84 8%
Student > Postgraduate 79 8%
Other 225 21%
Unknown 270 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 320 31%
Neuroscience 198 19%
Psychology 50 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 2%
Other 82 8%
Unknown 352 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#571,633
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Movement Disorders
#87
of 5,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,613
of 325,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Disorders
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.