You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.131237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holger J. Schünemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Itziar Etxeandia, Maicon Falavigna, Nancy Santesso, Reem Mustafa, Matthew Ventresca, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Kaja-Triin Laisaar, Sérgio Kowalski, Tejan Baldeh, Yuan Zhang, Ulla Raid, Ignacio Neumann, Susan L. Norris, Judith Thornton, Robin Harbour, Shaun Treweek, Gordon Guyatt, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Marge Reinap, Jan Brožek, Andrew Oxman, Elie A. Akl |
| Abstract |
Although several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 21 | 20% |
| Canada | 21 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| Chile | 6 | 6% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 68% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 25% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#418,489
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#733
of 9,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,893
of 327,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.