| Title |
Feasibility of Percutaneous Excision Followed by Ablation for Local Control in Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-011-2002-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Suzanne Klimberg, Cristiano Boneti, Laura L. Adkins, Maureen Smith, Eric Siegel, Vladimir Zharov, Scott Ferguson, Ronda Henry-Tillman, Brian Badgwell, Soheila Korourian |
| Abstract |
Percutaneous ablation of breast cancer has shown promise as a treatment alternative to open lumpectomy. We hypothesized that percutaneous removal of breast cancer followed by percutaneous ablation to sterilize and widen the margins would not only provide fresh naive tissue for tumor marker and research investigation, but also better achieve negative margins after ablation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,929,725
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#817
of 6,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,353
of 126,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.