You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of high-dose intraoperative remifentanil with or without amantadine on postoperative pain intensity and morphine consumption in major abdominal surgery patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1097/01.eja.0000434967.03790.0e |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sascha Treskatsch, Michael Klambeck, Shaaban A. Mousa, Andreas Kopf, Michael Schäfer |
Abstract |
Human volunteer studies demonstrate ketamine-reversible opioid-induced hyperalgesia, consistent with reports of increased postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. However, recent clinical trials showed controversial results after intraoperative administration of high-dose remifentanil. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,575,753
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Anaesthesiology
#13
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,440
of 321,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Anaesthesiology
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.