↓ Skip to main content

Defining the Medical Humanities: Three Conceptions and Three Narratives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Defining the Medical Humanities: Three Conceptions and Three Narratives
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10912-009-9094-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard Brody

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Arts and Humanities 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#391
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,715
of 166,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.