↓ Skip to main content

The effect of food deprivation on human resolving power

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
The effect of food deprivation on human resolving power
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1296-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noa Zitron-Emanuel, Tzvi Ganel

Abstract

The feeling of hunger is an inseparable part of people's daily lives. It has been established that hunger, caused by food deprivation, influences people's physiological and emotional state and their everyday behavior. Yet, it remains unclear whether and in which manner food deprivation affects the way people perceive their environment. In two experiments, we examined the effects of food deprivation on the perceptual resolution of food portion size. We calculated Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs) to measure sensitivity to detect the smallest difference between two stimuli of different sizes. Participants' resolution in both experiments was higher to detect changes in food size compared with baseline when they were hungry due to a short period of food deprivation. Food deprivation did not lead to any biases in the average perception of food size. The results show that food deprivation changes the way people perceive their environment. We discuss the possible role of attention in mediating the effect of food deprivation on the visual resolution of food size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 35%