↓ Skip to main content

Intraspecific Variation in the Skin-Associated Microbiome of a Terrestrial Salamander

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,210)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intraspecific Variation in the Skin-Associated Microbiome of a Terrestrial Salamander
Published in
Microbial Ecology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-0986-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofia R. Prado-Irwin, Alicia K. Bird, Andrew G. Zink, Vance T. Vredenburg

Abstract

Resident microbial communities living on amphibian skin can have significant effects on host health, yet the basic ecology of the host-microbiome relationship of many amphibian taxa is poorly understood. We characterized intraspecific variation in the skin microbiome of the salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii xanthoptica, a subspecies composed of four genetically distinct populations distributed throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and the Sierra Nevada mountains in California, USA. We found that salamanders from four geographically and genetically isolated populations harbor similar skin microbial communities, which are dominated by a common core set of bacterial taxa. Additionally, within a population, the skin microbiome does not appear to differ significantly between salamanders of different ages or sexes. In all cases, the salamander skin microbiomes were significantly different from those of the surrounding terrestrial environment. These results suggest that the relationship between E. e. xanthoptica salamanders and their resident skin microbiomes is conserved, possibly indicating a stable mutualism between the host and microbiome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,161,866
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#31
of 2,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,717
of 325,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.