↓ Skip to main content

Z-score of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion is a Useful Indicator of Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute-Phase Kawasaki Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Z-score of Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion is a Useful Indicator of Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute-Phase Kawasaki Disease
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1619-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ikuo Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Watanabe

Abstract

We previously reported the clinical usefulness of the mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) function in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) in the acute-phase. However, the feasibility of the MAPSE z-score has not been evaluated in patients with acute KD. We prospectively studied 60 KD patients without coronary aneurysms. The MAPSE z-scores were calculated using our standard MAPSE data. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured as a parameter of LV function. In total, 281 healthy age- and body size-matched subjects were chosen as the control group. The MAPSE z-score decreased in the acute-phase (median value, -1.4) and increased in the convalescent phase (median value, 0.18; P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the MAPSE z-score between patients in the convalescent phase and the control patients (0.18 vs. 0.02, P = 0.199). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that BNP was an independent predictor of the MAPSE z-score (β = 0.40, P < 0.005). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cutoff value for the MAPSE z-score to judge LV dysfunction was -0.9. The MAPSE z-score is a useful index to evaluate LV function, and the cutoff value of -0.9 can be an indicator to judge LV dysfunction in the patients with acute-phase KD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#1,101
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,579
of 310,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.