| Title |
Detection and molecular characterization of porcine kobuvirus in piglets in 2009–2013 in northern Thailand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tropical Animal Health and Production, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11250-017-1298-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Watchaporn Chuchaona, Pattara Khamrin, Arpaporn Yodmeeklin, Aphisek Kongkaew, Ratchaya Vachirachewin, Kattareeya Kumthip, Hiroshi Ushijima, Niwat Maneekarn |
| Abstract |
A total of 636 fecal samples collected from piglets with and without diarrhea during 2009 to 2013 were tested for porcine kobuvirus by RT-PCR. From a total of 528 fecal samples collected from piglets with diarrhea and 108 from healthy controls, 505 (95.6%) and 104 (96.3%) were positive for porcine kobuvirus, respectively. The detection rates of porcine kobuvirus were remarkable equally high in both diarrheic and healthy piglets. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that porcine kobuvirus strains detected in both symptomatic and asymptomatic piglets were genetically closely related to each other and also to other porcine kobuviruses reported worldwide. It was interesting to point out that one of the porcine kobuvirus strains isolated from piglet in our study was similar to a porcine-like bovine kobuvirus reference strain isolated previously in South Korea. This finding provided the evidence to support the interspecies transmission of kobuviruses between cattle and swine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2017.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#763
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,823
of 313,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.