| Title |
Crustal and upper mantle structure and deep tectonic genesis of large earthquakes in North China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-016-9009-1 |
| Authors |
ChunYong Wang, QingJu Wu, YongHong Duan, ZhiShuo Wang, Hai Lou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 70% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,450,539
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#68
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,171
of 312,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.