↓ Skip to main content

Umweltmedizinische Relevanz von luftgetragenen Mikroorganismen im Außen- und Innenbereich

Overview of attention for article published in Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Umweltmedizinische Relevanz von luftgetragenen Mikroorganismen im Außen- und Innenbereich
Published in
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00103-017-2553-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra M. Walser, Bernhard Brenner, Stefanie Heinze, Regine Szewzyk, Eike Wolter, Caroline E. W. Herr

Abstract

Airborne microorganisms occur ubiquitously in the ambient air. Besides allergic and irritative-toxic effects, they can cause infections after inhalation. Occupational studies have shown that an increased incidence of respiratory diseases is found in adequately exposed workers. In addition to respiratory diseases, severe systemic infections can also occur in particular cases, such as in the case of a hantavirus infection that is recognized as an occupational disease. In studies from environmental medicine, respiratory diseases have also been observed in residents living in the vicinity of livestock facilities and evaporative cooling towers. In the latter case, an infection risk may be caused by inhalation of legionella-contaminated aerosol from the exhaust air of such systems.Currently, there are no health-related exposure limits for airborne microorganisms released from such facilities. Environmental risk assessment can be carried out on the basis of the guideline VDI 4250 part 1, which relies on an excess of natural background concentration by facility-specific emissions. For the approval practice, the LAI-Leitfaden Bioaerosole is a uniform, standardized method for the determination and assessment of bioaerosol exposure.In indoor spaces, only a few mold types, such as Aspergillus fumigatus are able to trigger infections by local or systemic infection of the human organism. In particular, persons with an immune deficiency or allergies must be informed about the risks of mold exposure in indoor air. In general, mold growth in indoor spaces is a hygienic problem and must not be accepted as a matter of principle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,890,958
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#713
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,646
of 309,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.