You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incentivizing Blood Donation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Test Titmuss’ Hypotheses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Psychology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1037/a0032740 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Niza, Burcu Tung, Theresa M. Marteau |
| Abstract |
Titmuss hypothesized that paying blood donors would reduce the quality of the blood donated and would be economically inefficient. We report here the first systematic review to test these hypotheses, reporting on both financial and nonfinancial incentives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#693,973
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology
#126
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,578
of 213,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.