| Title |
Ecology of microfungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, July 1967
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02858637 |
| Authors |
Vasil T. Panasenko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#38
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225
of 2,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them