↓ Skip to main content

Chiropractors` experience and readiness to work in Indigenous Australian Communities: a preliminary cross-sectional survey to explore preparedness, perceived barriers and facilitators for…

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chiropractors` experience and readiness to work in Indigenous Australian Communities: a preliminary cross-sectional survey to explore preparedness, perceived barriers and facilitators for chiropractors practising cross-culturally
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12998-017-0144-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dein Vindigni, Barbara I. Polus, Sonja Cleary, Aunty Kerrie Doyle

Abstract

Indigenous people make up approximately 3% of the total Australian population and score poorer on all health indices, including back pain. Chiropractors are well placed to alleviate back pain, yet there is no research that considers chiropractors' readiness to treat Indigenous patients. This study explores chiropractors` experience working with Indigenous Australians, describes perceived barriers and facilitators to chiropractors' participation in Indigenous Healthcare and their willingness to engage in cultural competency training. This study used a non-representative cross-sectional design and a convenience sample. Participants were recruited via email invitation to complete an online survey and encouraged to send the invitation on to colleagues. A 17-item online-survey measured demographic data, perceived barriers and facilitators related to caring for Indigenous Australians, participants` level of comfort when working in Indigenous health, and their willingness to participate in cultural competency programs to enhance their skills, knowledge and cultural capacity when engaging with Indigenous Australians. Analysis of the data included descriptive statistics as well as thematic analysis of qualitative free text. One hundred and twenty-five chiropractors participated in the survey. The majority of participants (86%, n = 108) were employed in private practice. 62% of respondents were members of the Chiropractors' Association of Australia, 41% were Chiropractic and Osteopathic College of Australasia members. 60% of chiropractors considered that they had, or do treat Indigenous patients yet only 4% of respondents asked their patients if they identified as Indigenous. A majority of participants expressed a high level of 'comfort' or confidence in working with Indigenous people while only 17% of respondents had undertaken some form of cultural proficiency training. A majority of respondents (62.7%, n = 74) expressed an interest in working with Indigenous Australians and a majority (91%, n = 104) were willing to participate in training to develop Indigenous cultural competency. The study points to a need for chiropractors to have access to cultural proficiency training in order to develop the capability and confidence to engage respectfully with their Indigenous patients. This preliminary study has provided the researchers with valuable insights aiding the development and implementation of an Indigenous cultural proficiency program for chiropractors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 34 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 36 55%