| Title |
Optimal nutrition and the ever-changing dietary landscape: a conference report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-017-1460-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Shao, A. Drewnowski, D. C. Willcox, L. Krämer, C. Lausted, M. Eggersdorfer, J. Mathers, J. D. Bell, R. K. Randolph, R. Witkamp, J. C. Griffiths |
| Abstract |
The field of nutrition has evolved rapidly over the past century. Nutrition scientists and policy makers in the developed world have shifted the focus of their efforts from dealing with diseases of overt nutrient deficiency to a new paradigm aimed at coping with conditions of excess-calories, sedentary lifestyles and stress. Advances in nutrition science, technology and manufacturing have largely eradicated nutrient deficiency diseases, while simultaneously facing the growing challenges of obesity, non-communicable diseases and aging. Nutrition research has gone through a necessary evolution, starting with a reductionist approach, driven by an ambition to understand the mechanisms responsible for the effects of individual nutrients at the cellular and molecular levels. This approach has appropriately expanded in recent years to become more holistic with the aim of understanding the role of nutrition in the broader context of dietary patterns. Ultimately, this approach will culminate in a full understanding of the dietary landscape-a web of interactions between nutritional, dietary, social, behavioral and environmental factors-and how it impacts health maintenance and promotion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 33% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 280 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#611,551
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#162
of 2,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,084
of 314,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.