You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003809.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip E Benson, Nicola Parkin, Fiona Dyer, Declan T Millett, Susan Furness, Peter Germain |
| Abstract |
Demineralised white lesions (DWLs) can appear on teeth during fixed brace treatment because of early decay around the brackets that attach the braces to the teeth. Fluoride is effective in reducing decay in susceptible individuals in the general population. Individuals receiving orthodontic treatment may be prescribed various forms of fluoride treatment. This review compares the effects of various forms of fluoride used during orthodontic treatment on the development of DWLs. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 27% |
| Spain | 6 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Malta | 2 | 5% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 38% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 331 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 17% |
| Unknown | 93 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 196 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 92 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#977,161
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,898
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,148
of 322,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.