| Title |
Impact of caregiving for older people and pro-inflammatory biomarkers among caregivers: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-017-0765-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florence Potier, Jean-Marie Degryse, Marie de Saint-Hubert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 78 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 78 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Psychology | 22 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,723,813
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,001
of 1,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,103
of 326,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.