↓ Skip to main content

A comparison land-water environment of maximal voluntary isometric contraction during manual muscle testing through surface electromyography

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
A comparison land-water environment of maximal voluntary isometric contraction during manual muscle testing through surface electromyography
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2052-1847-5-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romualdo Castillo-Lozano, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare through surface electromyographic (sEMG) recordings of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) on dry land and in water by manual muscle test (MMT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Sports and Recreations 8 12%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#365
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,066
of 321,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.