You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiometabolic Risk Indicators That Distinguish Adults with Psychosis from the General Population, by Age and Gender
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0082606 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debra L. Foley, Andrew Mackinnon, Gerald F. Watts, Jonathan E. Shaw, Dianna J. Magliano, David J. Castle, John J. McGrath, Anna Waterreus, Vera A. Morgan, Cherrie A. Galletly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Psychology | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,538,491
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#104,947
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,682
of 323,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,931
of 5,598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.