↓ Skip to main content

Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Hill, Donald P. Frush, B. Kelly Han, Brian G. Abbott, Aimee K. Armstrong, Robert A. DeKemp, Andrew C. Glatz, S. Bruce Greenberg, Alexander Sheldon Herbert, Henri Justino, Douglas Mah, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Cynthia K. Rigsby, Timothy C. Slesnick, Keith J. Strauss, Sigal Trattner, Mohan N. Viswanathan, Andrew J. Einstein, Image Gently Alliance

Abstract

There is a need for consensus recommendations for ionizing radiation dose optimization during multi-modality medical imaging in children with congenital and acquired heart disease (CAHD). These children often have complex diseases and may be exposed to a relatively high cumulative burden of ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures including cardiac computed tomography, nuclear cardiology studies and fluoroscopically guided diagnostic and interventional catheterization and electrophysiology procedures. Although these imaging procedures are all essential to the care of children with CAHD and have contributed to meaningfully improved outcomes in these patients, exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with potential risks, including an increased lifetime attributable risk of cancer. The goal of these recommendations is to encourage informed imaging to achieve appropriate study quality at the lowest achievable dose. Other strategies to improve care include a patient-centered approach to imaging, emphasizing education and informed decision making and programmatic approaches to ensure appropriate dose monitoring. Looking ahead, there is a need for standardization of dose metrics across imaging modalities, so as to encourage comparative effectiveness studies across the spectrum of CAHD in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Other 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 50 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#888,780
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#250
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,050
of 327,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.