↓ Skip to main content

New Bioengineering Breakthroughs and Enabling Tools in Regenerative Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Current Stem Cell Reports, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
New Bioengineering Breakthroughs and Enabling Tools in Regenerative Medicine
Published in
Current Stem Cell Reports, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40778-017-0081-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvaro Mata, Helena S. Azevedo, Lorenzo Botto, Nuria Gavara, Lei Su

Abstract

In this review, we provide a general overview of recent bioengineering breakthroughs and enabling tools that are transforming the field of regenerative medicine (RM). We focus on five key areas that are evolving and increasingly interacting including mechanobiology, biomaterials and scaffolds, intracellular delivery strategies, imaging techniques, and computational and mathematical modeling. Mechanobiology plays an increasingly important role in tissue regeneration and design of therapies. This knowledge is aiding the design of more precise and effective biomaterials and scaffolds. Likewise, this enhanced precision is enabling ways to communicate with and stimulate cells down to their genome. Novel imaging technologies are permitting visualization and monitoring of all these events with increasing resolution from the research stages up to the clinic. Finally, algorithmic mining of data and soft matter physics and engineering are creating growing opportunities to predict biological scenarios, device performance, and therapeutic outcomes. We have found that the development of these areas is not only leading to revolutionary technological advances but also enabling a conceptual leap focused on targeting regenerative strategies in a holistic manner. This approach is bringing us ever more closer to the reality of personalized and precise RM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Lecturer 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Materials Science 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,314,649
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Current Stem Cell Reports
#52
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,531
of 311,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Stem Cell Reports
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.