↓ Skip to main content

Emergence of Financial Intermediaries in Electronic Markets: The Case of Online P2P Lending

Overview of attention for article published in Business Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
Emergence of Financial Intermediaries in Electronic Markets: The Case of Online P2P Lending
Published in
Business Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/bf03343528
Authors

Sven C. Berger, Fabian Gleisner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 278 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 72 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 94 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 57 20%
Computer Science 22 8%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 80 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,130,735
of 24,385,762 outputs
Outputs from Business Research
#29
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,042
of 225,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Business Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,385,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.