↓ Skip to main content

Variation of rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences in Rhizoctonia cerealis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Variation of rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences in Rhizoctonia cerealis
Published in
Current Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00284-017-1258-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Ji, Chunju Liu, Li Zhang, Aixin Liu, Jinfeng Yu

Abstract

Fifty-four single protoplast isolates (SPIs) were regenerated from three Rhizoctonia cerealis strains. A total of 169 rDNA-ITS regions were cloned and sequenced from these 54 SPIs. Variations in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions that flank the 5.8S gene were found within clones from the same strain, as well as within clones from the same SPI. These include variations in GC content and ITS length, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The different strains and SPIs GC contents range from 40.25 to 41.74% and from 42.40 to 45.02%, in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions, respectively. All SNPs occur in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions, with 3-6 and 4-6 polymorphic sites in each region, respectively, in the different strains. SNP variation is relatively stable within the same strain. For example, the 89 ITS sequences generated from isolate WK-207, regardless of SPI or clone, predominantly cluster into two separate clades on a phylogenetic tree, suggesting that nuclei genetic heterogeneity is related to ITS variation in R. cerealis. Although rDNA-ITS sequences from the three strains and different SPIs are somewhat variable, all of our ITS sequences cluster together in anastomosis subgroup AG-DI during phylogenetic analysis. The ITS variation we observed does not negatively influence R. cerealis anastomosis group or subgroup classification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,457,417
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#1,414
of 2,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,844
of 310,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.